A Philosophical Analysis of J. R. Daniel Kirk’s A Man Attested by God by Timothy J. Pawl

A Philosophical Analysis of J. R. Daniel Kirk’s A Man Attested by God by Timothy J. Pawl

A Philosophical Analysis of J.R. Daniel Kirk’s

A Man Attested by God

Timothy J. Pawl

Professor of Philosophy, University of St. Thomas (MN)

7.2 A3

Abstract: In his recent book, A Man Attested by God, J. R. Daniel Kirk argues that the Synoptic Gospels are best read through a paradigm in which Jesus is not a divine person, but rather an exalted non-preexistent human person. In what follows I set out Kirk’s argumentation in a precise logical structure, then assess it from a logical and philosophical point of view. My conclusion is mixed. The logical structure of Kirk’s argumentation against the Divine paradigm is good. If the texts he marshals against his early high Christology opponents are exegeted correctly—I give no assessment of Kirk’s historical or exegetical work—then he has succeeded in showing that his opponents’ arguments are in dire shape. On the other hand, Kirk’s own argumentation in favor of the Ideal Human paradigm is itself lacking in an essential component–—he does not support a necessary part of that paradigm, Christ’s alleged nonpreexistence.

Keywords: Divine paradigm, Ideal Human Figure paradigm, Early High Christology, The Synoptic Gospels, Preexistence.

Read the full article: A Philosophical Analysis of J.R. Daniel Kirk’s A Man Attested by God

In Other Words? The Difficult Question of Jesus’s Divinity in Schleiermacher by Matt Jenson

In Other Words? The Difficult Question of Jesus’s Divinity in Schleiermacher by Matt Jenson

In Other Words? the Difficult Question of Jesus’s Divinity in Schleiermacher

Matt Jenson

Matt Jenson (PhD, University of St. Andrews) is associate professor of theology for the Torrey Honors Institute at Biola University.

7.2 A4

Abstract: The apparently straightforward question of whether Friedrich Schleiermacher believed that Jesus is God proves surprisingly complex. As a teenager, he confessed to his father that he had lost his faith; but later he claimed to have become a pietist again, if of a higher order. He sharply critiqued Chalcedonian categories but spoke of “an actual being of God in [Christ].” Perhaps Schleiermacher offers an orthodox Christology in other words, one that purifies philosophical categories while retaining the central biblical witness to Jesus as God in the flesh. In the end, however, I argue a cumulative case on the basis of epistolary, exegetical, and dogmatic evidence that Schleiermacher persevered in his unbelief “that He, who called Himself the Son of Man, was the true, eternal God.”

Read the full article: In Other Words? the Difficult Question of Jesus’s Divinity in Schleiermacher

* Portions of this article appear in Matt Jenson, Theology in the Democracy of the Dead: A Dialogue with the Living Tradition (Baker Academic, 2019). Used by permission.

Theology in a Missional Mode: Harvie Conn’s Contribution by Michael W. Goheen

Theology in a Missional Mode: Harvie Conn’s Contribution by Michael W. Goheen

Theology in Missional Mode: Harvie Conn’s Contribution

Michael W. Goheen

Michael W. Goheen is professor of missional theology at Covenant Theological Seminary and director of theological education for the Missional Training Center

7.2

Systematic Theology Under Attack

Today systematic theology is under attack in many circles. It has been knocked off its privileged perch for a variety of reasons. John Goldingay speaks for many that “if systematic theology did not exist, it might seem unwise to invent it.”[1] We are in a new postmodern climate that distrusts both reason and all totalizing systems structured by human rationality. There is suspicion that the systems of theology are less systems found in Scripture and more products of creative human construction. Moreover, there has been a recovery of the storied shape of the Scriptural canon accompanied by a deepened awareness of the diversity of literary genres. The Bible is not simply a data dump of theological propositions,[2] nor a storehouse of isolated theological facts waiting to be arranged coherently by the systematic mind, nor a book with theological pieces of a jigsaw puzzle waiting to be assembled.[3] The Bible is in its overall shape a story of redemption with many genres that equip us differently to live in that story. Kevin Vanhoozer criticizes the approach of “large swaths of the Western tradition” with their reductionist view of revelation which sees “the task of theology” as consisting “in mining propositional nuggets from the biblical deposit of truth.”[4] It is not so evident today that the Scriptures can be reduced to propositional nuggets of truth. Rather the overall storied form of the scriptural canon consisting of many literary genres is exactly what we need and what God wanted us to have. A final critique is that much systematic theology is abstract and therefore unhelpful and irrelevant to the pastoral and missional life of the church. As Vanhoozer suggests, “Laypersons in the church would perhaps have been within their rights to bring a class-action suit against systematic theologians for criminal pastoral and missiological negligence.”[5]

Read the full article: Theology in Missional Mode: Harvie Conn’s Contribution

[1] John Goldingay, “Biblical Narrative and Systematic Theology,” in Max Turner and Joel B. Green, eds., Between Two Horizons: Spanning New Testament Studies and Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000), 138.

[2] Michael Williams, “Systematic Theology as a Biblical Discipline,” All for Jesus: A Celebration of the 50th Anniversary of Covenant Theological Seminary, eds. R.A. Peterson and S.M. Lucas (Fearn, Ross Shire: Christian Focus, 2005), 203. He critiques this view.

[3] Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1994), 29. He affirms this view.

[4] Kevin J. Vanhoozer, “Lost in Interpretation? Truth, Scripture, and Hermeneutics,” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 48, no. 1 (March 2005): 94.

[5] Kevin Vanhoozer, “One Rule to Rule Them All? Theological Method in an Era of World Christianity,” Globalizing Theology: Belief and Practice in an Era of World Christianity, ed. Craig Ott and Harold A. Netland (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2006), 93.

A Rose is Not Just a Rose: Re-integrating Faith with Learning in the Post-Christian Academy by Peter Rasor

A Rose is Not Just a Rose: Re-integrating Faith with Learning in the Post-Christian Academy by Peter Rasor

A Rose is Not Just a Rose: Re-integrating Faith with Learning in the Post-Christian Academy [1]

Peter Rasor

Peter Rasor (PhD, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary) is Senior Pastor at Lilburn Christian Church in Lilburn, GA and serves as Adjunct Professor in Philosophy at Grand Canyon University

7.2

Abstract: The integration of the Christian faith with learning has been a subject of discussion in Christian higher education for several decades. One pressing question is exactly how to accomplish this integration in every discipline of the Christian university, from the humanities to the sciences. This has proven to be somewhat difficult. A primary reason for this difficulty is due to the acceptance of what George Marsden calls “methodological secularism.” This paper offers four suggestions for overcoming methodological secularism seemingly entrenched in Christian universities in order to integrate successfully Christian faith with learning across all disciplines.

Read the full article: A Rose is Not Just a Rose: Re-integrating Faith with Learning in the Post-Christian Academy

[1] The phrase “a rose is not just a rose” is taken from Arthur Holmes, Building the Christian Academy (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2001), 44. Emphasis added.

Review of From Paradise to Promised Land: An Introduction to the Pentateuch, 4th Edition by T. Desmond Alexander

Review of From Paradise to Promised Land: An Introduction to the Pentateuch, 4th Edition by T. Desmond Alexander

Desmond Alexander. From Paradise to the Promised Land: An Introduction to the Pentateuch, 4th ed. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2022, pp. xxv + 422, $29.99.

Paradise

There are certain volumes which have imprinted themselves as being par excellence textbook material with respect to faculty and students alike. T. Desmond Alexander’s From Paradise to the Promised Land: An Introduction to the Pentateuch, now in its fourth (!) edition, is one such work. Initially published over twenty five years ago (Baker, 1995) From Paradise to the Promised Land is sui generis with respect to its pedagogical sensitivity and academic integrity.

In this carefully revised, expanded, and updated fourth edition, Alexander does not disappoint in continuing to well-serve his audience through introducing the major themes of the first five books of the Bible alongside substantial, erudite engagement with modern critical approaches to the composition of the Pentateuch, effectively guiding readers through this stimulating, not insignificant portion of Scripture (see the back cover). According to the author, “the present volume seeks to (1) focus on the main themes of the Pentateuch, viewed as a unified literary work, and (2) guide the reader through the maze of modern approaches to the study of the Pentateuch” (p. xvii). Unquestionably, Alexander succeeds in achieving these objectives. The question stands, though, as to what changes, specifically, have been implemented in this edition?

Prior to elaborating on these particulars, however, a brief overview of the text, as a whole, is in order. From Paradise to the Promised Land is comprised of two parts: (1) The Main Themes of the Pentateuch (eighteen chapters). This section covers (for example) the royal lineage in Genesis, why Israel?, the covenant at Sinai, and other related things, (2) Pentateuchal Criticism (six chapters) focuses on the Documentary Hypothesis and the future of Pentateuchal studies. A recommended reading section is also included which is comprised of a seven page overview of different Pentateuchal commentaries and a (select) twenty-five page bibliography of different articles. Three thorough indices (author/Scripture/subject) round out the text. One particularly nice touch for all serious students is that many key Hebrew words (in transliteration) also appear within the subject index, thus making for easy reference tracking (more on this later).

As in the previous three editions of Paradise to Promised Land, the text itself is very user-friendly. Writing-wise, Alexander pitches his style just right for this readership. There is also an effective use of bold face type, special shading, good use of white space, ample headings sub-headings, etc., and multiple charts, diagrams, tables, and figures. Each graphic is crisp and clear. One new-to-this-edition illustration is ‘Mount Sinai as Archetype of the Tabernacle’ wherein Alexander delineates the boundary lines of the Holy of Holies, the Holy Place, and the Courtyard of the Tabernacle as they relate to and compare with Mt. Sinai (p. 101). Such stimulating visual content throughout the text is not only a treat to the eyes but also the mind as the images duly convey much that is of great theological import in a highly compressed yet relatable way.

The “New Testament Connections” at the end of every chapter (section one) do a great job of helping students connect the dots to the Pentateuch and the biblical metanarrative (cf. pp. 222–26). The ‘set off’ text for chapter summaries (section one) are also beneficial to students. If only the author had included some type of end-of-chapter questions as this provision would have been an especial boon for busy ministers, pastors, and church leaders, to help accommodate the volume to a group Bible study or the like. Perhaps future edition(s) might make this change.

With respect to the primary differences between the fourth and the first, second, and third edition(s), one notes that Alexander’s review and critique of modern critical approaches to the composition of the Pentateuch, i.e., part two (see above) is placed at the end of the book—rather than at the beginning, as in the previous three editions. As Richard E. Averbeck states in his endorsement (see the back cover), this is a “good move. Alexander’s discussion in this section sorts out the current plurality of critical positions in a readable way and offers sound, reasonable response to them.” Alexander’s shift of having this material at the end of the text also allows for a clearer exposé (‘show’ vs. ‘tell’) of how “the Pentateuch cannot be understood solely by reconstructing the process by which it was composed; the whole is much greater than the sum of its parts” (pp. 231–32). Would, though, that the author had thoroughly engaged with the discipline of rhetorical-criticism (rhetoric as persuasion) as it receives only the briefest mention in his overarching discussion of literary criticism (p. 232). Arguably, rhetorical criticism is the true “future of Pentateuchal studies” (cf. pp. 331–59) as it leverages the crème de crème of the literary-critical discipline but also moves beyond it, effectively ‘filling the void’ between various diachronic and synchronic approaches. It is most regrettable Alexander missed this opportunity.

One minor critique is the lack of any sort of commentary in the “recommended further reading” (pp. 361–92). Surely some annotations would have helped fledging student(s). Could not have this section, perhaps, have been replaced by a complete bibliography of the text at hand (thus negating the need for such details in the footnotes) and then some select reference(s) be made to specialized books offering further assistance? One thinks, for instance, of Kenton L. Sparks’ The Pentateuch: An Annotated Bibliography (Wipf and Stock, 2019) or John F. Evan’s volume, A Guide to Biblical Commentaries and Reference Works 10th ed. (Zondervan, 2016).

A more significant criticism, though, is the lack of sustained interaction with Hebrew-language resources. To be clear, while it is certainly most welcome (and appreciated) to have special reference(s) made to ‘abad, gôy, ḥāram/ḥērem, qādaš, śādeh, ṭāhôr, ṭāmē’ and the like within the text itself, would not students benefit from having had some reference(s) to the standard, user-friendly (read English speaking) lexicons, such as NIDOTTE and the like?

To conclude, despite these infelicities, I heartily recommend T. Desmond Alexander’s From Paradise to the Promised Land: An Introduction to the Pentateuch without hesitation.

Its primary users are most likely to include Bible college/Christian university college and seminary students along with Christian educators and, one hopes, invested pastors/laypeople.

Dustin Burlet

Millar College of the Bible

Review of Echoes of Exodus: Tracing a Biblical Motif by Bryan D. Estelle

Review of Echoes of Exodus: Tracing a Biblical Motif by Bryan D. Estelle

Estelle, Bryan D. Echoes of Exodus: Tracing a Biblical Motif. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2018, pp. 351, $42, paperback.

Echoes

Bryan D. Estelle is professor of Old Testament at Westminster Seminary, California, where he has taught since 2000. Estelle received his doctorate from The Catholic University of America. He is the author of numerous essays, articles, and books, including Salvation through Judgement and Mercy: The Gospel According to Jonah.

Bryan Estelle takes his readers on a tour de force of one of the Bible’s most significant themes, moving from Creation to the world-to-come in a sweeping survey of texts. On the surface, his book reflects a straight-forward yet comprehensive tracing of the biblical motif of exodus. In reality, Estelle has created a case study rich in methodological insight and hermeneutical acumen. In Chapter 1 he introduces the linguistic and philosophical backgrounds of intertextuality. He follows this discussion by stating his hermeneutical presuppositions and outlining his method for determining an allusion, including carefully clarifying what he means by typology.

In chapter 2 Estelle identifies the cosmic-mountain ideology of the ancient Near East in the Creation account and demonstrates the similarities between creational realities and the Tabernacle. Estelle is clear that both creation and exodus are essentially about a great king forming a people and bringing them to himself at his holy abode (pp. 64, 68, and 93). Estelle helpfully demonstrates that the exodus motif must include all stages of the Israelite journey, from initial deliverance to the wilderness wanderings and then finally to the conquest of Canaan.

Estelle then explores how the Psalter uses the exodus motif in chapter 4, and in chapter 5 Estelle examines Isaiah’s use and adaptation of the exodus motif, demonstrating how Isaiah foretells a coming new and greater exodus and a “way” in the wilderness. Chapter 6 studies the use of the exodus motif within exilic and post-exilic writings by examining Jeremiah and Ezra-Nehemiah.

Chapter 7 discusses how Matthew and Mark develop the exodus motif. According to Estelle, Mark develops Jesus as the one who inaugurates Isaiah’s “way” in the wilderness. Matthew portrays Jesus as a (new) and better Moses, the obedient son, and the one who takes up Israel’s calling. In Chapter 8 Estelle treats Luke-Acts by tracing the use of the “way” terminology throughout the two-volume text, with a particular emphasis on the Gentile inclusion in Jesus’ new exodus.

In chapters 9, 10, and 11, Estelle investigates the use of the exodus motif in the Pauline corpus, in 1 Peter, and in Revelation, respectively. Estelle’s final chapter presents a summary of his findings by suggesting a number of contributions his study makes to the field of Biblical Theology. First, his study of one particular motif validated his appropriation of intertextuality as a method. Second, Estelle reiterates that the exodus motif in the Scriptures must encompass the entire trajectory of exodus from liberation to final destination in God’s presence. For Estelle, the exodus motif can serve as a synecdoche for the story of salvation. Third, Estelle leans heavily on his own terminology of entitlement to the world-to-come as a forensic/legal notion and therefore proposes that the results of his study could inform recent debates on justification by providing a both/and approach rather than an either/or approach. For those interested in further study on intertextuality, Estelle includes a lengthy appendix that provides significantly more background into the linguistic and philosophical background of intertextuality as developed by Kristeva and Bahktin.

Estelle must be applauded for undertaking a study of this magnitude in a consistent and even-handed manner. When compared with Robert and Wilson’s book of the same title from the same year, Estelle’s book is much more rigorous methodologically and thus much more convincing. Estelle’s insistence on defining the exodus trajectory more broadly to include wilderness and the telos of exodus is one of the greatest contributions of his book for Biblical Theology.

In my opinion, chapter 5 (Isaiah’s Rhapsody) was perhaps the heart of the book and functioned to bridge the use of the exodus motif from the Old Testament to the New by highlighting how Isaiah develops and re-imagines this crucial biblical theme. The use of this motif is particularly significant given that each of the Gospels incorporates Isaiah’s use of this motif in their respective introductions.

Often when Estelle presents data regarding the similarities between exodus and creational themes, Estelle appears to prioritize exodus themes and language over creational themes and language with no real rationale for doing so. In this regard Estelle’s exclusion of the Gospel of John for review seems to be a significant miss, given John’s utilization of both creation and (new) exodus language. In his one-page entry on the book of Colossians (p. 284), Estelle appears to be grasping to demonstrate just exactly why the first chapter of Colossians reflects the exodus motif, while failing to mention the obvious creational motifs that are organic to the text. In addition, Estelle’s conclusion that the “influence of the exodus motif on the apostle Paul is pervasive” (p. 285) seems overstated, in that while the motif is present, he fails to demonstrate the motif to be pervasive or controlling.

Due to its comprehensive and technical nature, Estelle’s book will most likely find a home on the shelf of the academic or the serious student of the Word who desire to have a methodologically sound grasp of one of the most important themes for Biblical Theology. Students new to the concept of intertextuality will most likely find his theoretical engagement demanding, while students eager for a case-study in intertextuality will find his book rigorous yet rewarding.

Jared Kaessner
PhD Candidate, Columbia International Seminary

Review of Psalms of the Faithful: Luther’s Early Reading of the Psalter in Canonical Context by Brian T. German

Review of Psalms of the Faithful: Luther’s Early Reading of the Psalter in Canonical Context by Brian T. German

German, Brian T. Psalms of the Faithful: Luthers Early Reading of the Psalter in Canonical Context. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2017, pp. 232, $24.99, paperback.

Psalms

In this work, Brian German presents a fresh perspective on the function of the faithful synagogue as an interpretive category within the Dictata super Psalterium, Martin Luther’s first lecture series through the Psalms in the years 1513-1515.  According to German, professor of theology at Concordia University Wisconsin and director of the Concordia Bible Institute, part of the importance of the Dictata for understanding the early Luther is the way in which it furnishes us with an almost daily account of his struggle to make sense of each passage unfolding before him.  This struggle, German points out, provides a window, not only into the interpretive development of the young Doctor, but into the specific theological principles adopted, abandoned, or merely altered throughout his journey.  As he says, “Luther, well informed of the sacred tradition but not yet sure how best to use it, set out on a journey through the Psalter to see where it would take him” (p. 10).

German, an able guide throughout, begins by situating his discussion within the complex history of interpretation surrounding Luther’s approach to Scripture in general and the Old Testament in particular.  Specifically, the study is directed at further defining what is for Luther the abiding relevance of the Old Testament in the contemporary church, especially as it pertains to the place of the Psalms in the Christian life.  To accomplish this, German focuses his attention on the notion of the faithful synagogue, outlining its role as a positioning system of sorts in recent efforts to trace Luther’s theological movements within the Dictata with greater precision.  The primary aim of the analysis is to examine how consideration of the Psalter’s canonical structure informs previous attempts to discern what (or who) the faithful synagogue is and what role it plays in the overall theological system of Luther.  This approach, German notes, “introduces a fresh set of questions in the realm of the faithful synagogue’s relationship to the content of the Book of Psalms, such as where the faithful synagogue ‘originates,’ how Luther incorporates the faithful synagogue beyond its origination, what influence the faithful synagogue has on Luther’s subsequent exegesis, and so on” (p. 22).

Of these previous attempts, those of James S. Preus and Scott Hendrix feature most prominently in German’s argument. In his words, “Because Preus and Hendrix both grant some fluctuation in Luther’s Dictata and yet argue for opposite ends of the spectrum regarding the theological significance of such, these two scholars, in our judgment, prove to be the most suitable conversation partners” (p. 19). More specifically, Preus and Hendrix concur in their understandings both of the distinctness of Luther’s appropriation of the faithful synagogue in relation to his medieval climate and of his sea change taking place toward the end of the Dictata; however, where they differ is in their ultimate theological assessment of what this faith finally means for Luther.  Does Luther signal a novel break with the medieval tradition by elevating to an extent the faith of the Old Testament community (Preus), or does he simply maintain his medieval inclinations toward the interpretive centrality of New Testament faith, albeit with some alterations to the received tradition (Hendrix)? Ultimately, while recognizing these contributions for clarifying the complexities of a moving Luther, German contends what is lacking in each case is an accounting for the structure of the text itself, namely “a moving Psalter” (p. 23).

Building on these developments by way of a more consciously canonical reading of the Dictata, German locates the origin of the faithful synagogue within the Asaphite corpus of the Psalter’s third book (Pss. 73-83), significantly earlier than either of his interlocutors.  The first step in his argument is “a much closer examination of Luther’s unique emphases vis-à-vis Augustine and Cassiodorus,” which allows one to see more clearly when Luther, on the one hand, is essentially appealing to their views and when, on the other, he is speaking with his own voice.  Following this, the second step is then to “enhance our findings by examining Luther’s interpretation of similar psalmody appearing (canonically) before the Asaphite corpus in order to surmise what effect, if any, the new context in Book III may have had on his exegesis” (p. 29).  In other words, wherever Luther departs from both his forebears and his earlier self, it is likely, German says, indicative of this interpretive shift shining through.  After dealing extensively with each of these steps, German then moves beyond the Asaphite corpus to demonstrate how the faithful synagogue, once developed, maintains an abiding influence in Luther’s exegetical decision-making throughout the remainder of the Psalter.

The overall analysis German provides is thorough and compelling, not to mention refreshingly readable for such a multi-layered discussion.  Even though there are moments amid so many details where it can be easy to lose sight of the argument’s main track, careful engagement along the way proves fruitful at journey’s end.  For example, the corrective offered by German in his treatment of “the most immediate hermeneutical implications of Luther’s increasing preoccupation with the Old Testament perspective” as shown in his discussion on Psalm 119 and the sensus literalis in Luther is a convincing culmination to his previous findings, especially in their “answering how Luther’s integration of the faithful synagogue relates to the fundamental task of interpreting Scripture” (pp. 131–132). Thus, insofar as he attempts to recalibrate our understanding of the faithful synagogue as a determining influence in the exegetical mind of Luther, German succeeds in painting a clearer picture of where such a conception likely originates and how it ought to inform our approach, not only to Luther, but to his beloved Bible.

Despite a rather modest concession that the study merely scratches the surface of so many distinct conversations, especially within Luther studies and biblical studies, scholars will not find themselves disappointed with German’s contribution.  Similarly, pastors and laypeople alike will find valuable guidance for how better to read the Psalms as members themselves of this faithful synagogue, having been prepared to move with greater confidence “into the uneven terrain of meditation and lament, promise and praise.” (27)  German, with a harmony of clarity and complexity, gives us a quintessentially human Luther longing to understand these quintessentially human prayers and, in so doing, gives us a model for our own struggles through this most precious of books.

Shawn M. Langley

Kirby Laing Centre for Public Theology

Cambridge, UK

Review of Conquered Conquerors: Love and War in the Song of Songs by Danilo Verde

Review of Conquered Conquerors: Love and War in the Song of Songs by Danilo Verde

Verde, Danilo. Conquered Conquerors: Love and War in the Song of Songs. Atlanta: SBL, 2020, pp. 271, $40, paperback.

Conquered

Danilo Verde is a postdoctoral associate with the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) at the Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies in KU Leuven, Belgium, in addition to being a member of the Biblical Studies research group at the same university. In this revised edition of his dissertation that advances the frontiers of scholarship in Biblical Metaphor Studies, Verde provides readers with an insight into the military metaphors, similes and scenarios undergirding the Song of Songs’ depiction of human love, for which no extensive research using cognitive linguistics exists. Conceptual metaphor theory and blending theory were mainly employed by Verde to demonstrate that the root metaphor LOVE IS WAR undergirds the Song’s conceptualization of both the Song’s lovers and their love, marking the Song as both conceptually unitary and thematically coherent, despite its seeming fragmentary composition. In organizing his argument, Verde adduces four surface metaphors – WOMAN IS FORTIFIED CITY (pp. 45–102), MAN IS CONQUEROR (pp. 103–132), WOMAN IS CONQUEROR (pp. 133–168), and LOVE IS STRIFE (pp. 169–202) – which he claims serve not only to sustain the aforementioned root metaphor throughout the Song but ultimately held the Song together as a literary piece.

With respect to the strengths of this monograph, Verde’s stimulating observations and extensive analysis on how the Song’s source domain of war interacts with its target domain of love to create blended concepts of the lovers as both conquerors and conquered is impressive, particularly at the level of detail drawn from the field of cognitive linguistics, the Hebrew Bible and cognate literature. The author clearly demonstrated to what extent the Song’s warlike imagery is conventional in the conceptual world of its Umwelt, as well as aspects in which the Song’s unconventional perception of eros and gender roles shines the brightest (pp. 45, 96–99, 130, 200). While the expression of love as strife is not entirely alien to the biblical tradition and cognate literature in the ancient Near East, what makes Verde’s work stand out is his exposition of the unconventional trends unique to the Song’s characterization of eros in warlike terms. This is done by portraying both the male and female lovers as simultaneously conquerors and conquered in a never-ending game of love; thus, reconfiguring gender stereotypes and constructions in the socio-cultural milieu from which the Song draws its inspiration (pp. 37, 103, 130–131, 216).

Another feature that sets the book apart is its creative recognition and interpretation of the Song’s military language, in which the implication of the Song’s warlike imagery is constructed from the encounter between the world of the author and the world of the book (p. 41). And by exhaustively analysing the Song’s military metaphors based on their clausal constructions, underlying conceptualizations and communicative purposes, Verde effectively established that the Song’s understanding of love as warlike strife is revealed internally in the perpetual tension between the lovers themselves, and externally in the tension between the lovers and their environment (p. 201). As Verde sees it, the above three-level analysis helped to shed light on the underlying mechanism veiling some problematic texts within the Song’s complex literary compositions, such as the unclear scene of the bride in a litter of military escort in Song 3:6–8 and the puzzling military dance of Song 7:1 (pp. 169–172, 216).

Similarly, the organization of the book, which shows how the root metaphor LOVE IS WAR is portrayed through the abovementioned four surface metaphors, with each surface metaphor being made evident through a number of figurative expressions, makes most of the author’s argument both succinct and compelling (p. 31). At the same time, the author’s use of recent developments in cognitive metaphor studies, particularly the blending theory and Gerald Steen’s three-dimensional model, helped in the analysis of the undercurrent metaphor LOVE IS WAR in greater depth such that it is seen to underlie all the clusters of surface metaphors already mentioned.

Unfortunately, some of Verde’s analyses seem less compelling than others. A good example is his argument that the female lover receives a novel portrayal with regard to her personality and sexuality in the Song, which is minimized by his admission that it is only through the eyes of the male lover that such recognition is acknowledged (p. 218). Likewise, a few of his analytical reasonings, leading to some of the blended concepts he drew from the Song, are less easily accessible than others. For instance, it is somewhat less convincing to the reviewer how he arrives at the blended concept love subjugates all in Song 8:6–7 (pp. 187–201). Moreover, it is hard to see the direct relevance of discussing the dialectic of the Song’s warlike metaphors and the Song’s troublesome metaphors under the concluding chapter when they could have been explored in more depth in a separate chapter.

On balance, in spite of some negligible shortcomings, the richness and range of Verde’s work is remarkable. His monograph definitely makes up for the scant attention commentators have paid to the Song’s military language. Not only is it a welcome addition to the literature on Biblical Metaphor Studies, but it will also prove an invaluable resource for anyone interested in Hebrew Bible metaphors in general and the Song of Songs in particular. For this reason, Verde’s monograph could count as a seminal text in the field of Biblical Metaphor Studies.

Joseph Nnamdi Mokwe, KU Leuven, Belgium

Review of Making Christian History: Eusebius of Caesarea and His Readers by Michael J. Hollerich

Review of Making Christian History: Eusebius of Caesarea and His Readers by Michael J. Hollerich

Hollerich, Michael J. Making Christian History: Eusebius of Caesarea and His Readers. Oakland, California: University of California Press, 2021, pp. 316, $95.00, hardback.

Recent trends in early Christian studies have turned their attention toward questions of textuality: what does it mean to read a text, what choices informed an author’s inclusion or omission of details, and how has a text been received among its readers? Moreover, what does it mean to be a reader? These concerns rise to the surface rather quickly when engaging with Eusebius’s Ecclesiastical History. In Making Christian History, Michael Hollerich (Professor of Theology, University of St. Thomas) provides students of early Christian studies, patristics, and Christian historiography with a necessary ground-clearing of all things Ecclesiastical History—and, in doing so, makes a welcome contribution to the field writ large.

To be clear, Hollerich does not aim to provide commentary on Eusebius’s work itself; instead, Hollerich begins with the work’s composition and analyzes the ways it has been both received and reappropriated since. In other words, Hollerich’s interest lies primarily in the social and cultural impacts Eusebius’s work had rather than trying to dissect the contents within the work itself. This caveat noted, Hollerich provides a helpful introduction to the literary mode and intellectual place of Eusebius in his foundational chapter (particularly pp. 22–46). Following this, he dedicates chapters to the contexts of Ecclesiastical History’s reception history, including the context of the Christian Empire (pp. 47–87), the Non-Greek East (pp. 88–140), the Latin West (pp. 141–170), and Byzantium (pp. 171–190), while the penultimate chapter touches on the “rediscovery” of Ecclesiastical History in the Renaissance and Reformation eras (p. 237). The book concludes with an eye toward modernity and the future of Eusebian reception moving forward (pp. 238–273). The benefit of this structure lies in the reality that Hollerich leaves nearly no historical stone unturned, inviting more peripheral and neglected communities of literary production to the table. Hollerich’s work casts a wide net, and in doing so demonstrates precisely the same thing he reiterates from Emanuela Prinzivalli in the book’s final chapter: “We find it hard to imagine how western historiographical thought, and our knowledge of historical sources in Christianity’s first centuries, would have been possible without the Ecclesiastical History” (p. 268).

This arrangement, of course, is not above critique altogether. Moments wherein Hollerich’s analysis of Eusebian reception history feels as if it maintains a narrow window of application, intended only for those interested in the practice of Christian historiography. Those outside these immediate literary concerns may use Eusebius as a lens through which to read Christian history, and the reviewer wonders if synthesizing it for an only slightly broader audience may benefit the overall impact the work will have. (After all, surveying the whole of Christendom is quite the task.) Those readers conversant with notions of reading, reception, appropriation, and textuality in history may not encounter hiccups in the work, but those less familiar with these ideas might find the work a less fruitful endeavor overall due to these conceptual hurdles. Perhaps one final chapter reemphasizing those commonalities and distinguishing features of Eusebius’s reception throughout various contexts would aid in this regard, or perhaps mitigate the problem altogether.

On the other hand, the tenor of the present review seeks to be in large part one of commendation: Hollerich has an intimate knowledge of the literature, and his book is one of the rare works wherein the reader can sense the need for a lifetime of careful scholarship to germinate the ideas within it. Hollerich succeeds in carrying forward the torch of modern scholarship focused on Eusebius and his contributions to Christian identity and history. Additionally, Hollerich does an excellent job of bringing his survey of Eusebius’s reception history back into conversation with modern questions as he concludes the book, bringing up some of those less-immediately-textual concerns that permeate Eusebius today, such as Eusebius’s anti-Jewish apologetic, Origenism, and theo-political vision (pp. 269–273).

If it has not yet been made apparent, this work is recommended for those seeking to understand not merely what Eusebius sought to write or accomplish in Ecclesiastical History but also why it became as socially influential as it did. This reviewer was most enthralled with the first few chapters—which set the trajectory for the more specific contextual analyses that follow—along with the concluding chapter. While these chapters felt most rife with immediate theological investigation and application, Hollerich offers a valuable guide to the practice of studying Christian texts and their reception. In doing so, he provides students of early Christian studies, patristics, historiography, and historical theology with a worthy endeavor that demands careful reading—even if Eusebius himself does not come to bear on their research.

Cody Glen Barnhart

University of Aberdeen